Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults and occurs primarily in older adults. Treatment typically involves a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy – the so-called Stupp regimen. Since the disease has a poor prognosis despite modern therapies, the focus is not only on prolonging life but also, in particular, on maintaining quality of life and providing individualized care for those affected.

Inselspital, Department of Neurosurgery – our facts and figures
- Excellence: highly specialized neurosurgeons and specially trained oncology nurses (Advanced Practice Nurses or APNs for short).
- Expertise: 478 tumor surgeries (biopsies and resections) in 2025, of which 437 were gliomas
- Interdisciplinary team: specialists from 7 specialties meet in our weekly tumor board – neurosurgery, neurology, neuroradiology, oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, pathology
- Developed and researched at Inselspital: innovative neuromonitoring and navigation techniques for surgical safety and avoidance of deficits
- Deficit rate among the lowest worldwide: documented and published rate of 3–5% for permanent surgery-related deficits in motor eloquent risk tumors is among the lowest worldwide!
- Resection rate among the highest worldwide: The rate of > 90% complete resection for gliomas is among the highest worldwide!
- State-of-the-art technological equipment with intraoperative imaging, fluorescence techniques, laser thermotherapy and more.
- Complementary treatment concept: our OPTIMISST protocol (OPTIMISST stands for Optimized Standard and Supportive Therapy).
- Certification: Certified Brain Tumor Center since 2016, guaranteeing a high quality standard in oncological treatment.
What is a glioblastoma?
Glioblastomas are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults. They arise from the brain’s glial cells, grow along fiber tracts, and thereby spread locally, regionally and supraregionally. Glioblastomas generally do not metastasize (form secondary tumors) outside the nervous system.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, a glioblastoma is classified as WHO Grade 4 and thus belongs to the highest category of malignancy among brain tumors. The classification is based on histological features such as
- a high rate of cell division
- the presence of necrosis (tissue death)
- increased formation of new blood vessels (vascular proliferation)
In addition, molecular genetic analyses are now performed. These can identify specific alterations, such as methylation of the MGMT promoter. This information has prognostic significance and can influence the decision to pursue certain treatment approaches.
Rare variants of glioblastoma include gliosarcoma, giant-cell glioblastoma, and epithelioid glioblastoma.
- Methylation

Methylation of the MGMT promoter. Tumors with a methylated MGMT promoter respond better to treatment with temozolomide and have a longer median survival compared to tumors without MGMT promoter methylation (blue versus red curve). Quelle: Hegi et al. MGMT Gene Silencing and Benefit from Temozolomide in Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 997-1003. An important genetic alteration in glioblastoma cells is what is known as DNA methylation of the MGMT promoter. In this process, methyl groups are attached to specific sections of a glioblastoma cell’s DNA, which blocks the production of the DNA repair protein MGMT. If a tumor can no longer repair its DNA, it becomes more susceptible to chemotherapy drugs.
About half of all glioblastomas exhibit this genetic alteration. It is associated with a better response to chemotherapy and a more favorable prognosis.
- Genome-wide methylation-based tumor classification
Large-scale genetic studies such as the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) have provided further important insights into the molecular characteristics and subtypes of glioblastomas *. These studies have shown that glioblastomas can be distinguished not only by their microscopic appearance but also by their molecular (epi)genetic profile.
Based on this, genome-wide methylome-based tumor classification for gliomas and glioblastomas is becoming increasingly important *. In this process, the entire tumor DNA is analyzed using EPIC methylation diagnostics to detect an additional 930,000 methyl groups. The data obtained are compared with a reference database, enabling classification into molecularly defined tumor groups with varying prognostic significance.
Methylome classification is now an integral part of the modern WHO classification and supports more precise diagnosis as well as more personalized treatment planning. At Inselspital, this diagnostic method is routinely used for glioblastoma patients.
Another advantage of the method is its high degree of standardization. The digital analysis of methylation data facilitates information exchange between specialized centers and aids in the classification of diagnostically challenging or unclear cases.
How common is glioblastoma and who is affected?
Glioblastoma typically occurs in older adults (50–85 years) with an average age of 64 years *. Although glioblastomas can occur in children, they account for only 2.9% of all brain tumors in the 0–19 age group *.
Overall, these are rare tumors with approx. 3–4 new diagnoses per 100,000 inhabitants per year *. Men are affected 1.5 times more frequently than women.
What are the causes of glioblastoma?

Most glioblastomas develop without any apparent cause. The only proven risk factor for developing a glioblastoma is previous radiation therapy to the head.
A link to head injuries, environmental toxins, or diet has not yet been conclusively established *, *.
In rare cases, the condition is caused by an inherited disorder. These include, among others, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, which is caused by a mutation in the tumor suppressor gene TP53. Affected individuals have a significantly increased risk of developing various tumors at a young age *.
Interestingly, patients with allergic diseases (asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergies, etc.) are said to have a lower risk of developing a glioblastoma *.
New scientific findings suggest that glioblastoma develops over several years. The first tumor cell likely arises years before diagnosis. The rapid growth typical of glioblastoma presumably does not begin until further genetic changes occur over time. This explains why an MRI that previously showed no abnormalities can reveal a large tumor within just a few months *, *.
Does radiation from cell phones cause brain tumors?
Large-scale epidemiological studies in humans have so far found no evidence that the use of cell phones leads to an increased risk of developing a brain tumor *, *.
Complex animal studies indicate an increased tumor risk from mobile phone radiation in male rats and mice, but without showing a dose-response relationship and without being able to explain the lack of this effect in female animals.
In humans, the INTERPHONE study found a slightly increased risk of developing glioma with excessive cell phone use *. Another frequently discussed case-control study from Sweden also found a link between the occurrence of gliomas and cell phone use *, *. Based on these two studies, the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies electromagnetic radio frequency fields as "possibly carcinogenic" *.
In contrast, however, several large-scale epidemiological studies on humans have found no evidence of an increased risk of brain tumors *, *, *, *. This includes the Million Women Study published after the IARC report, which collected prospective data from almost 800,000 participants and found no increased risk *.
Different authorities therefore also classify differently: from "harmless" to "possibly slightly carcinogenic not excluded".
What symptoms does a glioblastoma cause?
The symptoms basically depend on the location of the tumor in the brain. The same applies to all brain tumors:
- Epileptic seizures: epileptic activity or hyperexcitability of healthy tissue at the edge of the tumor
- Failures or functional disorders: Impairment of speech, motor function, sensation, vision, calculation, thinking, memory, balance, orientation, mood, behavior, alertness, drive, social behavior, etc. due to pressure of the tumor on neighboring brain structures or ingrowth into the surrounding tissue
- Headaches, nausea, vomiting: an advanced tumor leads to an increase in pressure in the skull
- Nonspecific symptoms: If the tumor grows in functionally silent (non-eloquent) parts of the brain, it may go unnoticed for some time until non-specific symptoms such as changes in personality, fatigue, forgetfulness, disorientation and confusion occur. The symptoms usually last for several weeks to a few months at the time of diagnosis.
Magnetic resonance imaging
To diagnose the condition, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain is typically performed.
A characteristic feature of glioblastoma is a ring-shaped, irregular pattern of contrast uptake with a dark center – an area of dead cells (necrosis). The surrounding brain tissue appears bright, which is consistent with cerebral edema. Unlike with metastases, this zone in glioblastoma often also contains active tumor cells. If the tumor spreads along the nerve fibers, multiple lobes of the brain may be affected.
Advanced neuroimaging
Further imaging characterization can be performed using «Advanced Neuroimaging».
This includes, among other things, perfusion imaging to measure local blood flow. Since glioblastomas often exhibit increased angiogenesis and blood volume, these measurements can provide clues about tumor activity.
Another method is magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MR spectroscopy, MRS), which can be used to measure specific metabolites in tumor tissue. In gliomas, characteristic changes in these metabolites can be detected.
The results of these examinations can be particularly helpful in distinguishing glioblastomas from other brain tumors, such as metastases or lymphomas.
Surgery – the first step in therapy
The standard therapy for glioblastomas consists of a combination of microsurgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Surgical resection is a key component of the treatment plan *, *, *, *, *, *, *. The more tumor mass that can be removed, the more favourable the further course of the disease *, *, *, *, *, *, *, *, *. Therefore, a complete tumor resection, which is confirmed by an MRI image, is the goal of the operation.
Removing the tumor also reduces pressure on the surrounding brain tissue and can thereby alleviate tumor-related symptoms. The removed tumor tissue is then examined histologically and through molecular biology.
Because glioblastomas diffusely infiltrate the brain tissue and grow along the fiber tracts of the white matter, tumor cells that are not visible on imaging remain even after complete removal of the tumor visible on MRI. For this reason, the surgery is followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy to combat these remaining tumor cells.
Why should radical surgery be aimed for in the case of glioblastoma?
According to current studies, it is assumed that at least 80% of the tumor must be removed for the patient to have a survival advantage from the operation.
A clear survival advantage can only be achieved by complete removal of the tumor as verified by MRI *, *.
Therefore, the primary goal of surgery should be the complete removal of the brain tumor, ideally including the infiltration zone visible in the MRI image, and this without causing permanent neurological damage.
Surgery with a margin: supramarginal resection
Glioblastomas have tumor cells that extend beyond the margin visible on MRI. This infiltration zone around the tumor has a different biological profile than the tumor core itself * and may have an influence on the prognosis of the therapy *.
The infiltration zone of glioblastoma is a dynamic microenvironment shaped by the tumor. Tumor cells spread to other regions of the brain along white fiber tracts and perivascular spaces, thereby partially evading the immune system. Tumor-associated macrophages and microglial cells play an important role. Initially, they can monitor the tumor cells; however, as tumor density increases, they increasingly develop growth-promoting and immunosuppressive properties. In this way, they facilitate the tumor’s further spread. *
The infiltration zone surrounding the tumor does not absorb contrast medium and is difficult to delineate radiologically. However, focusing solely on the part of the tumor that is easy to delineate radiologically is not optimal from an oncological point of view.
A further reduction in the tumor burden can be achieved with a more extensive resection up to the functional limits. This is referred to as supratotal or supramarginal resection *, *, *. These supratotal resections are now an integral part of the treatment concept for selected patients.
It is known from tumor surgery that large parts of "functionally silent", so-called non-eloquent regions of the brain can be removed without causing permanent deficits in the patient *. However, supramarginal resection should always be performed simultaneously with neurophysiological monitoring and mapping in order to avoid permanent neurological damage.
How quickly should surgery be performed?
Due to the rapid growth of glioblastomas, surgery should be performed promptly. The more time passes, the more tumor cells migrate into the surrounding area. The tumor expands and becomes larger, the surgical risk increases and the possible radicality of the resection decreases. The operation should therefore ideally be performed within 1–2 weeks of diagnosis.
Our OPTIMISST protocol
There are a number of factors that contribute to a tumor treatment being more successful. We have developed our own treatment concept based on these factors, the so-called OPTIMISST protocol. OPTIMISST stands for "Optimized Standard and Supportive Therapy" and complements conventional therapy for brain tumours. This protocol only exists in this form at our clinic.
Magnetic resonance imaging
To ensure optimal surgical planning, a special MRI is first performed to assess the tumor as accurately as possible. Depending on the tumor’s location, additional tests may be necessary.
A functional MRI (fMRI) can help pinpoint important brain functions such as speech and movement.
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) can be used to precisely locate the motor centers. This noninvasive examination provides important information for planning the surgical approach and surgical strategy.
Fiber tracking: visualization of the brain fiber tracts

Tractography or fiber tracking visualizes key fiber tracts in the brain. This preoperative visualization helps plan the safest access route to the tumor and preserve important nerve pathways.
Of particular importance is the pyramidal tract, which connects the motor center of the brain to the spinal cord. Other key fiber tracts are responsible for functions such as speech and vision.
Should a biopsy be carried out before surgery?
If the tumor can be resected successfully, we do not perform a separate biopsy beforehand. If resection is not possible—either because the tumor is located in a functionally important area or because of its diffuse spread—a biopsy should at least be performed for tissue examination and to confirm the diagnosis. The risk of complications from a biopsy is low; life-threatening bleeding occurs in only about 1% of cases.
For tumors that are difficult to delineate on MRI or do not take up contrast agent, supplemental imaging can help determine the optimal biopsy site and avoid misdiagnoses. FET-PET can be used for this purpose. This technique employs the labeled amino acid fluoroethyltyrosine (FET), which accumulates in areas of the tumor with particularly high metabolic activity. By superimposing the PET images onto the MRI images, it is often possible to identify a so-called hotspot with increased tumor activity, which can serve as the target region for the biopsy.
Surgical safety is guaranteed by various innovative techniques. Thanks to precise surgical procedures and extensive intraoperative monitoring, the complication rate of tumor resections is now very low *, *, *, *, *, *, *, *.
Neuronavigation

During surgery, neuronavigation functions like a «GPS» and guides the neurosurgeon. The MRI performed before the surgery provides the individualized «map».
Augmented Reality
The fiber tracts, the tumor, and other important brain areas, which were mapped prior to surgery, can be virtually overlaid on the surgical microscope and projected onto the surface of the head. This augmented reality makes it possible to plan the surgical incision to be as small as possible and as large as necessary.
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM)
Removing as much of the tumor as possible is only advisable if important brain functions are preserved. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) helps monitor motor, speech, and other important brain functions during surgery and prevent surgery-related damage.
The type of monitoring is tailored individually to the tumor’s location and the adjacent brain functions. Techniques used include monitoring, dynamic mapping, and stimulation techniques.
Monitoring

During monitoring, the motor pathway is continuously monitored throughout the operation. To do this, the motor center is electrically stimulated, and the resulting muscle response is measured. A detectable response indicates that the motor pathway remains intact and functional.
Dynamic mapping

Continuous dynamic mapping is used to determine the location of a major nerve pathway whose exact position is unknown prior to surgery. During tumor removal, microelectrodes integrated into the surgical suction device are used to continuously measure the distance to the motor pathway—similar to how radar works.
Awake surgery

If a tumor is located near important functional centers—such as those responsible for speech, math, or reading—an awake brain surgery may be necessary. During this procedure, the patient performs tasks while the brain tissue is specifically stimulated to locate and preserve important functions.
5-ALA fluorescence

5-ALA (Gliolan®) is taken orally as a liquid several hours before surgery. The active ingredient accumulates preferentially in tumor cells of high-grade gliomas, causing them to fluoresce reddish under blue light. This makes it easier to distinguish the tumor from healthy brain tissue during surgery and allows for more precise removal. *, *, *, *, *
Studies at Inselspital show that fluorescent tumor areas sometimes extend beyond the contrast-enhancing tumor visible on magnetic resonance imaging. *
Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT)

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive, image-guided procedure in which tissue is selectively heated and destroyed using laser energy. It is particularly suitable for deep-seated brain tumors and other hard-to-reach lesions.
Intraoperative imaging
The extent of resection is verified during surgery using ultrasound and—for particularly precise monitoring—intraoperative MRI. Any residual tumor detected can be removed during the same surgery. At Inselspital, the operating room is directly connected to a high-field MRI scanner.
MRI examination 24–48 hours after surgery
Since it is often difficult to distinguish between tumor tissue and healthy brain tissue at the tumor margin, residual tumor tissue may remain despite the use of state-of-the-art surgical techniques.
A follow-up MRI within 24–48 hours shows whether any removable residual tumor is present. In such cases, a second surgery can be performed as early as the following day. At Inselspital, this applies to about 5–10% of patients. Our experience shows that the residual tumor can usually be completely removed during this procedure and that the second surgery is well tolerated. *
Histology and treatment planning
Following the histological examination of the excised tissue, the next steps are discussed at our weekly interdisciplinary tumor board. This involves collaboration among specialists in neurosurgery, radiation oncology, oncology, neuropathology, neuroradiology, and neurology. The team is supplemented by internationally renowned neuro-oncology experts who regularly join the conference via videoconference.
Neurological rehabilitation
Neurological rehabilitation may be beneficial in cases of neurological deficits, but it should not delay further tumor treatment. Patients without neurological deficits generally do not require inpatient rehabilitation.
Radiation and Chemotherapy – the next step in treatment
For patients in good general health, surgery is typically followed by combined radiation and chemotherapy, known as the Stupp regimen. Treatment usually begins 3–4 weeks after surgery to allow the surgical wound sufficient time to heal. *, *
Radiation therapy is administered over 6 weeks, with five sessions per week. A total of 30 radiation treatments are administered, with a total dose of 60 Gy. Common side effects include fatigue, nausea, skin irritation, and hair loss.
Temozolomide is administered daily in parallel with radiation therapy. After completion of radiation therapy, chemotherapy is continued as maintenance therapy. This involves a five-day chemotherapy cycle every four weeks, typically for six cycles.
Elderly patients
Older patients (over 70 years of age) represent a special case in treatment. In order to avoid putting too much strain on older patients, they are treated according to a shortened schedule. The radiotherapy is then usually carried out in 15 sessions up to a total dose of 40 Gy *.
Alternatively, for patients in poorer general condition, either radiation therapy alone or chemotherapy alone may be administered – depending on the tumor's molecular markers *.
Chemotherapeutic agents
Temozolomide (Temodal®) is the primary chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of glioblastoma *, *. It is administered daily during radiation therapy and then continued as maintenance therapy. If well tolerated, treatment typically consists of six cycles. This is followed by regular follow-up MRI scans.
Temozolomide is generally well tolerated. Nausea and fatigue are common. A rare but serious side effect is suppression of blood cell production in the bone marrow.
For patients with clear MGMT promoter methylation and good overall health, we additionally use lomustine and treat according to the lomustine/temozolomide regimen.
This approach is based, among other things, on the results of the NOA-09 study. In this randomized Phase III study, the combination of lomustine and temozolomide demonstrated longer overall survival than temozolomide alone in patients with MGMT-methylated glioblastoma. However, due to the relatively small study population, the results should be interpreted with caution. *, *, *, *
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy is an important area of research in the treatment of glioblastoma. The goal is to specifically activate or support the body’s own immune system so that it can better recognize and fight tumor cells.
Glioblastoma is considered an immunologically “cold” tumor: the tumor microenvironment contains only a few lymphocytes, but numerous myeloid cells that have an immunosuppressive effect. This hinders an effective immune response and explains why immunotherapies to date have not yet achieved a breakthrough. Various approaches are therefore being intensively researched:
Peptide vaccination
Peptide vaccination aims to specifically activate the immune system against certain characteristics of tumor cells so that it can recognize and attack them. Large-scale studies to date, including those involving the EGFR-specific peptide vaccine Rindopepimut, have failed to demonstrate any convincing clinical benefit. *
Oncolytic viruses
These viruses preferentially infect tumor cells and cause them to die or make them vulnerable to attack by the immune system. Promising research results have been reported for glioblastomas using recombinant polioviruses (PVSRIPO), adenoviruses (DNX-2401), and TOCA 511 *, *, *.
Radioimmunotherapy
In radioimmunotherapy, a radioactive radionuclide is coupled to a glioma-specific antibody. This allows the radiation to be delivered specifically to the tumor cells. Initial studies have shown encouraging results *. This approach is being further investigated in the NOA-22 study, among others.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
The immune system has natural control mechanisms, known as checkpoints, that prevent an excessive immune response. These include, among others, the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway: When this pathway is activated, the activity of certain immune cells (T cells) is suppressed.
Tumor cells can exploit this natural «brake» to evade attack by the immune system. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block this brake and enable T cells to better recognize and attack tumor cells again.
Checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab, durvalumab, and avelumab are being used successfully to treat various types of cancer. Their use in glioblastoma is still being investigated, including in the NOA-21 study.
Tumor Treating Fields
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFs) are a non-invasive treatment for glioblastoma. Using electrodes worn on the shaved scalp, the Optune® device generates weak electric fields. These are intended to disrupt the division and proliferation of tumor cells.
In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, a study showed a survival benefit when TTFields were used after radiation therapy in addition to chemotherapy *. For effective treatment, the device should be worn daily for as long as possible.

Methadone
In recent years, methadone has repeatedly been discussed as a potential treatment for glioblastoma. Despite reports in online forums and the media, there is as of yet no scientifically substantiated evidence of methadone’s effectiveness in treating glioblastoma. Methadone is therefore not part of the established standard of care.
Vortioxetine
Laboratory and animal studies show that the approved antidepressant Vortioxetine can inhibit glioblastoma cells. It is currently unclear whether this effect will also be confirmed in patients. Further studies are planned to investigate its therapeutic potential. *
Temsirolimus
Current research is exploring personalized treatment strategies that specifically target molecular alterations in glioblastoma. A recently published study showed a significant survival benefit in patients with an activated mTOR signaling pathway who were treated with temsirolimus. Further studies on this topic are in the works. *
What happens if the tumor grows again?
Unfortunately, most patients with a glioblastoma suffer a recurrence at some point, even after successful surgery and subsequent ideal follow-up treatment. One reason for this is the diffuse infiltrating growth of these tumors. On the other hand, there are indications that so-called tumor stem cells play an important role. These may already play a leading role in the development of the tumor, are resistant to the usual therapies and thus trigger the recurrence. Ideally, a therapy should also be effective against these tumor stem cells. Unfortunately, this is not yet the case.
The treatment for a relapse depends on various factors:
- neurological condition of the patient
- temporal dynamics
- molecular tumor markers
- therapies already received
At Inselspital, we take an aggressive approach based on observing the growth pattern. As tumors grow, they create their own environment in which they can thrive better. That is why close MRI monitoring and immediate treatment of even the smallest recurrences is one of our most important principles of the OPTIMISST protocol. We are convinced that a waiting period of several weeks leads to a reduction in survival time, because during this time the tumor sends "refueled" cells into the wider environment that evade surgical resection.

Surgery for a recurrence
In the event of recurrence, surgical resection of the recurrent tumor should always be considered. However, a higher complication rate is to be expected with recurrence operations. In this case, survival time can only be favorably influenced if the functions that ensure a good quality of life for the patient are maintained.
Through the ReSurge trial, which was initiated at Inselspital and is currently being conducted in Europe, we are investigating which patients benefit from surgery to treat a recurrence.
Radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for a recurrence
In addition to surgery, further radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can often be carried out. In patients with MGMT promoter hypermethylation and a relapse during the treatment break, the DIRECTOR study was able to prove that these patients benefit again from treatment with Temodal *.
A standardized second-line chemotherapy does not yet exist. We decide on this as part of our interdisciplinary tumor board at the Inselspital. Important factors in the decision are the different molecular characteristics of the tumor and a detailed genetic analysis of the tumor's driving mutations. In discussions with renowned experts, who are connected to the tumor board via conference call, it may then be possible to identify and use drugs that have been successful in other tumor types with the same mutations.
In the LITT trial at Inselspital, we are investigating whether minimally invasive laser treatment for early glioblastoma recurrence prior to the start of radiation and chemotherapy can improve treatment outcomes.
What is the prognosis for glioblastoma?
The prognosis for glioblastoma is influenced by numerous factors. The available findings are based primarily on average values from large patient cohorts and therefore do not allow for a reliable prediction of the individual course of the disease. The factors that can influence the prognosis are explained below.
Factors that have a positive impact on survival time
Factors that cannot be influenced
- younger age
- good general and performance condition
- no loss of neurological functions before the operation
- in the tumor tissue: MGMT promoter hypermethylation of the tumor
Factors that can be influenced
- short time to surgery, i.e. earliest possible removal of the tumor
- minimal or no steroid administration (dexamethasone) before and after the operation
- no loss of partial neurological functions after the operation, in particular no paralysis or partial paralysis resulting as a complication of an operation
- complete tumor removal in T1 contrast MRI (CRET according to RANO)
- complete removal of the FLAIR-positive signal in the MRI or the T2-hyperintense signal in the MRI
- no complications during and after the operation
- minimal or no steroid administration (dexamethasone) during radiotherapy
- multifactorial influences (other factors on the OPTIMISST checklist)
Long-term survival with glioblastoma under current therapy
Long-term survivors are defined as patients who live for more than five years after diagnosis. With current standard treatment, approximately 10% of those affected achieve this *. However, the likelihood depends on various factors. For example, the rate is 17% among patients under 50 years of age, compared to 6.4% among those over 50. A younger age, good overall health, MGMT promoter methylation, and complete tumor resection are associated with longer survival *, *, *.
Although many long-term survivors exhibit cognitive deficits, a good quality of life can still be achieved in most cases *, *. It is important to note that recurrences also occur in long-term survivors; therefore, one cannot speak of a cure *.
Why you should seek treatment at Inselspital
At Inselspital, an individualized treatment strategy is developed for each patient. At the certified Brain Tumor Center, findings and treatment options are jointly evaluated by an interdisciplinary team.
Our weekly Tumor Board brings together specialists from neurosurgery, neurology, neuro-oncology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and pathology. The Brain Tumor Center is certified according to the criteria of the German Cancer Society and thus meets defined quality standards.
With the OPTIMISST protocol developed at Inselspital, we also follow a complementary approach aimed at providing treatment as early and comprehensively as possible.
-
McGirt MJ, Mukherjee D, Chaichana KL, Than KD, Weingart JD, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Association of surgically acquired motor and language deficits on overall survival after resection of glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:463-470.
-
Pitter KL, Tamagno I, Alikhanyan K et al. Corticosteroids compromise survival in glioblastoma. Brain. 2016;139:1458-1471.
-
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:v1-v75.
-
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, de Blank PM et al. American brain tumor association adolescent and young adult primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:i1-i50.
-
Lahkola A, Auvinen A, Raitanen J et al. Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. International journal of cancer. 2007;120:1769-1775.
-
Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG et al. The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a “state of the science” review. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16:896-913.
-
Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018;555:469-474.
-
Soffietti R, Baumert BG, Bello L et al. Guidelines on management of low-grade gliomas: report of an EFNS-EANO Task Force. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17:1124-1133.
-
Inskip PD, Tarone RE, Hatch EE et al. Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:79-86.
-
Pedersen CL, Romner B. Current treatment of low grade astrocytoma: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1-8.
-
Claus EB, Black PM. Survival rates and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with supratentorial low-grade gliomas: data from the SEER program, 1973-2001. Cancer. 2006;106:1358-1363.
-
Wen PY, Kesari S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:492-507.
-
Mintz A, Perry J, Spithoff K, Chambers A, Laperriere N. Management of single brain metastasis: a practice guideline. Curr Oncol. 2007;14:131-143.
-
Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW et al. A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:494-500.
-
Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS et al. Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1942-1948.
-
Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS. An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:3-8.
-
Sanai N, Berger MS. Extent of resection influences outcomes for patients with gliomas. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2011;167:648-654.
-
Cancer GARN. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455:1061-1068.
-
Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:190-198.
-
Salvati M, Pichierri A, Piccirilli M et al. Extent of tumor removal and molecular markers in cerebral glioblastoma: a combined prognostic factors study in a surgical series of 105 patients. Journal of neurosurgery. 2012;117:204-211.
-
Capelle L, Fontaine D, Mandonnet E et al. Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases. Journal of neurosurgery. 2013;118:1157-1168.
-
McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Attenello FJ et al. Extent of surgical resection is independently associated with survival in patients with hemispheric infiltrating low-grade gliomas. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:700-7; author reply 707.
-
Bloch O, Han SJ, Cha S et al. Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:1032-1038.
-
Chaichana KL, Cabrera-Aldana EE, Jusue-Torres I et al. When gross total resection of a glioblastoma is possible, how much resection should be achieved. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:e257-65.
-
Keles GE, Lamborn KR, Berger MS. Low-grade hemispheric gliomas in adults: a critical review of extent of resection as a factor influencing outcome. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:735-745.
-
Oppenlander ME, Wolf AB, Snyder LA et al. An extent of resection threshold for recurrent glioblastoma and its risk for neurological morbidity. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:846-853.
-
Schucht P, Murek M, Jilch A et al. Early re-do surgery for glioblastoma is a feasible and safe strategy to achieve complete resection of enhancing tumor. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79846.
-
Schucht P, Knittel S, Slotboom J et al. 5-ALA complete resections go beyond MR contrast enhancement: shift corrected volumetric analysis of the extent of resection in surgery for glioblastoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156:305-12; discussion 312.
-
Gill BJ, Pisapia DJ, Malone HR et al. MRI-localized biopsies reveal subtype-specific differences in molecular and cellular composition at the margins of glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:12550-12555.
-
Jain R, Poisson LM, Gutman D et al. Outcome prediction in patients with glioblastoma by using imaging, clinical, and genomic biomarkers: focus on the nonenhancing component of the tumor. Radiology. 2014;272:484-493.
-
Yordanova YN, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H. Awake surgery for WHO Grade II gliomas within “noneloquent” areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a “supratotal” resection. Journal of neurosurgery. 2011
-
Gil-Robles S, Duffau H. Surgical management of World Health Organization Grade II gliomas in eloquent areas: the necessity of preserving a margin around functional structures. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8.
-
Duffau H. Is supratotal resection of glioblastoma in noneloquent areas possible. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:e101-3.
-
Ius T, Angelini E, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Mandonnet E, Duffau H. Evidence for potentials and limitations of brain plasticity using an atlas of functional resectability of WHO grade II gliomas: towards a “minimal common brain”. Neuroimage. 2011;56:992-1000.
-
Duffau H, Taillandier L. New concepts in the management of diffuse low-grade glioma: Proposal of a multistage and individualized therapeutic approach. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17:332-342.
-
De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH, Duffau H, Berger MS. Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2559-2565.
-
Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D, et al. Usefulness of intraoperative electrical subcortical mapping during surgery for low-grade gliomas located within eloquent brain regions: functional results in a consecutive series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg 2003;98:764-78.
-
Duffau H, Peggy Gatignol ST, Mandonnet E, Capelle L, Taillandier L. Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping of language pathways in a consecutive series of 115 patients with Grade II glioma in the left dominant hemisphere. J Neurosurg 2008;109:
-
Keles GE, Lundin DA, Lamborn KR, Chang EF, Ojemann G, Berger MS. Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical perirolandic gliomas located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:369-375.
-
Raabe A, Beck J, Schucht P, Seidel K. Continuous dynamic mapping of the corticospinal tract during surgery of motor eloquent brain tumors: evaluation of a new method. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:1015-1024.
-
Chacko AG, Thomas SG, Babu KS et al. Awake craniotomy and electrophysiological mapping for eloquent area tumours. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:329-334.
-
Spena G, Garbossa D, Panciani PP, Griva F, Fontanella MM. Purely subcortical tumors in eloquent areas: awake surgery and cortical and subcortical electrical stimulation (CSES) ensure safe and effective surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115:1595-1601.
-
Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:392-401.
-
Stummer W, Stocker S, Wagner S et al. Intraoperative detection of malignant gliomas by 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced porphyrin fluorescence. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:518-25; discussion 525.
-
Pogue BW, Gibbs-Strauss S, Valdés PA, Samkoe K, Roberts DW, Paulsen KD. Review of Neurosurgical Fluorescence Imaging Methodologies. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2010;16:493-505.
-
Hebeda KM, Saarnak AE, Olivo M, Sterenborg HJ, Wolbers JG. 5-Aminolevulinic acid induced endogenous porphyrin fluorescence in 9L and C6 brain tumours and in the normal rat brain. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140:503-12; discussion 512.
-
Schucht P, Beck J, Abu-Isa J et al. Gross total resection rates in contemporary glioblastoma surgery: results of an institutional protocol combining 5-aminolevulinic acid intraoperative fluorescence imaging and brain mapping. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:927-35; discussion 935.
-
Louvel G, Metellus P, Noel G, et al. Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection does not impact survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Radiother Oncol 2016;118:9-15.
-
Loureiro LV, Victor ES, Callegaro-Filho D et al. Minimizing the uncertainties regarding the effects of delaying radiotherapy for Glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118:1-8.
-
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987-996.
-
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:459-66.
-
Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W et al. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:709-722.
-
Schäfer N, Proescholdt M, Steinbach JP et al. Quality of life in the GLARIUS trial randomizing bevacizumab/irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-nonmethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:975-985.
-
Blumenthal DT, Gorlia T, Gilbert MR et al. Is more better? The impact of extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of EORTC and NRG Oncology/RTOG. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:1119-1126.
-
Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD et al. Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4085-4091.
-
Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F et al. Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:678-688.
-
Wick W, Platten M, Meisner C et al. Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:707-715.
-
Perry JR, Laperriere N, O’Callaghan CJ et al. Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1027-1037.
-
Weller M, Butowski N, Tran DD et al. Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1373-1385.
-
Desjardins A, Gromeier M, Herndon JE et al. Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Recombinant Poliovirus. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:150-161.
-
Lang FF, Conrad C, Gomez-Manzano C et al. Phase I Study of DNX-2401 (Delta-24-RGD) Oncolytic Adenovirus: Replication and Immunotherapeutic Effects in Recurrent Malignant Glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1419-1427.
-
Mitchell LA, Lopez Espinoza F, Mendoza D et al. Toca 511 gene transfer and treatment with the prodrug, 5-fluorocytosine, promotes durable antitumor immunity in a mouse glioma model. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:930-939.
-
Reulen HJ, Poepperl G, Goetz C et al. Long-term outcome of patients with WHO Grade III and IV gliomas treated by fractionated intracavitary radioimmunotherapy. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:760-770.
-
Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA et al. Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2535-2543.
-
Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kästner B et al. MGMT Promoter Methylation Is a Strong Prognostic Biomarker for Benefit from Dose-Intensified Temozolomide Rechallenge in Progressive Glioblastoma: The DIRECTOR Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2057-2064.
-
Gately L, McLachlan SA, Philip J, Ruben J, Dowling A. Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: a closer look. J Neurooncol. 2018;136:155-162.
-
Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C et al. Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain. 2007;130:2596-2606.
-
Reifenberger G, Weber RG, Riehmer V et al. Molecular characterization of long-term survivors of glioblastoma using genome- and transcriptome-wide profiling. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:1822-1831.
-
Archibald YM, Lunn D, Ruttan LA et al. Cognitive functioning in long-term survivors of high-grade glioma. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:247-253.
-
Steinbach JP, Blaicher HP, Herrlinger U et al. Surviving glioblastoma for more than 5 years: the patient’s perspective. Neurology. 2006;66:239-242.
-
Bähr O, Herrlinger U, Weller M, Steinbach JP. Very late relapses in glioblastoma long-term survivors. J Neurol. 2009;256:1756-1758.
-
Kite T, Yadlapalli V, Verma R, Porwal M, Herbst J, Karlovits S, Wegner RE, Shepard MJ. A systematic review of high-grade glioma associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 10;48(1):290. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03437-w.
-
Nebeling FC, Fuhrmann F, Mittag M, Musacchio F, Antony H, Gockel N, Friker LL, Leonardelli S, Filser S, A D, Stork M, Bano D, Pietsch T, Giordano FA, Zhou Q, Parrinello S, Hölzel M, Herrlinger U, Salomoni P, Fuhrmann M. Microglia-glioblastoma crosstalk mediates glioblastoma invasion at the far infiltration zone. Immunity. 2026 Apr 14;59(4):1075-1091.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2026.03.010. Epub 2026 Mar 31.
-
Lee S, Weiss T, Bühler M, Mena J, Lottenbach Z, Wegmann R, Sun M, Bihl M, Augustynek B, Baumann SP, Goetze S, van Drogen A, Pedrioli PGA, Penton D, Festl Y, Buck A, Kirschenbaum D, Zeitlberger AM, Neidert MC, Vasella F, Rushing EJ, Wollscheid B, Hediger MA, Weller M, Snijder B. High-throughput identification of repurposable neuroactive drugs with potent anti-glioblastoma activity. Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3196-3208. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03224-y. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
-
Wick W, Lanz LM, Wick A, Harting I, Dettmer S, Suwala AK, Ketter R, Tabatabai G, Seliger C, Glas M, Burger MC, Timmer M, Ringel FA, Mildenberger I, Schulz-Schaeffer WJ, Winkler F, König L, Herold-Mende C, Eisenmenger A, Pfister SM, Renovanz M, Bendszus M, Sahm F, Platten M, Kessler T. Molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in glioblastoma: the phase 1/2a N2M2 umbrella trial. Nat Med. 2025 Oct;31(10):3534-3541. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03928-9. Epub 2025 Sep 5.










